File contributed for use on USGenWeb/MOGenWeb Lincoln County Heritage Page by Thomas J. Mudd, 10 March 2002.  Link change or update: 16 Mar 2002


Diary of Judge Henry Thomas Mudd, written 1875-1890


Previous Page                                                                                                                                                 Next Page

 

Diary Page 68

Longevity, Death of Mr. Flynn, etc.

July 24th 1877.

Died Lawrence Flynn in the 60th year of his age. He was born in Cork County, Ireland in 1817. Came to America and settled in Washington County, Missouri in the year 1840, and moved to Lincoln County, near Millwood in 1854 where he lived up to the time of his death. Mr. Flynn was one of our most estimable and valued citizens, and through his urbane and modest deportment, strict veracity, and sterling honesty through life, had won for himself, as he richly deserved, the highest confidence and esteem of all who knew him. He leaves a widow and nine children to mourn the loss of a good husband and father, and a whole community a most kind and generous neighbor and friend.

His funeral took place at the Catholic Church at Millwood of which he was a most valued member on the 25th attended by a very large concourse of people both Catholic and Protestant to pay the last tribute of respect to their much beloved and valued friend.

After writing the above for the Troy Herald on the death of Mr. Flynn, my brother in law, who leaves the only sister of Mary (my wife) a widow. I have been lead to think and investigate the ages of our oldest men yet living in the

Diary Page 69

congregation and who will it is expected be buried in our Catholic grave yard at Millwood, which list is taken from the Catholic congregation in and around Millwood of about 100 families, or a supposed aggregate population of 600 souls.

Diary Page 69 (continued)

Name

Mudd, James H

Doherty, Hugh

Sullivan, Danl.

Koester, Joseph

Koester, Wm.

Burns, James

Wheatley, Stephen

Elder, Wm. F.

Wheatley, Matthew

Ryan, Martin

Father Clary

Dyer, Geo. I

Hoey, George

Cummins, Tim

Rinamon, Peter

Sweany, Francis

Elder, Basil R.

Shocklee, James M.

Mansfield, Michael

Mudd, Henry T.

McGrath, Timothy

Mattingly, Stephen

Age

78

76

76

76

72

72

69

69

67

66

65

64

64

64

64

63

63

62

62

61

61

60

Name

Mudd, Robert

Shay, Michael

Burns, Thomas

Norton, Wm.

Murphy, Wm.

Berry, Thomas

Mudd, Heschiah

Sands, Geo. F.

Cunningham, Geo.

Corley, Michael

Mudd, Ben. F.

Coffey, Michael

Burns, Pat

Lynch, Michael

Hora, Francis

Scott, Philip

O’Hanlon, Michael

O’Hanlon, Edward

Wheatley, A. C.

Wheatley, H. P.

42 Names

Age

60

60

58

58

58

57

56

56

56

56

55

55

54

53

53

52

52

50

50

50

2573

 

 

Diary Page 70

I have not taken any extended account of the women of our congregation but will make mention of five of the oldest amongst us.

Mrs. Elizabeth Sands 78, Mrs. James Wilson 77, Mrs. Elizabeth Robey 77, the maiden name of the former and later were Mudd and both distant relatives of my own.

Aunt Nancy the widow of my uncle Aloysius Mudd 76, Miss Margaret Broderick living for many years with my neighbor Mr. James Lyons, called Aunt Peggy 76.

It will thus be seen that the aggregate ages of the 42 men named of 50 years and over is 2573, and the average ages of the whole 42 is 61 years and 3 months. And that the aggregate ages of the first named 24 that are 60 and upwards is 1594 and the average age of the 24 are 66 years and 5 months.

I think in point of longevity this will be found a good reasoning, and that in a large majority of cases of the same amount of population fewer old people will be found.

I should have mentioned that the first names 6 of 72 and upwards aggregate 450 years and the average age of the 6 old men is 75 years and the average of the 5 old ladies very nearly 77.

Diary Page 71

County Bonds

Many of the counties in Missouri as well as other counties and towns in the Western States some 8 or 10 years ago created large debts for the various purposes of internal improvements but principally to build railroads.

During the period of contracting these debts, times were good, and money plenty, and a general rush towards public improvements, railroads etc. by counties and towns in their corporate capacities.

Many railroads were contracted for, and bonds issued to build them that were of doubtful propriety, and that may never be built, and if built may never pay either in interest or public advantage a profit on the money invested in them.

It is clearly been that corporations like individuals under the influence of an inflated currency and a seeming plenty of money and credit at the time being, are very apt to contract debts that can never be paid, at least without much trouble and embarrassments under a change of times, low prices of products, and financial embarrassments, that will most surely sooner or later occur.

Now for the last two or three years under great pressure and embarrassments and the very low prices that the farmers are able to get for their surplus production, many of the counties find

Diary Page 72

much difficulty and embarrassment in paying off these bonded debts thus created.

And quite a number of them have refused to pay the principal or interest and suffered themselves sued in the Courts - putting in bar or offset all manner of illegalities or irregularities in the issue of these bonds – and the legal compliance with the terms by railroad corporations etc.

In most or nearly all of these cases however that have reached their final decision in the Supreme Court of the United States, judgment has been rendered against the counties, and mandamus issued against the County Courts to force them to levy the tax to pay the principal and interest on the bonds, but the question as to whether mandamus even from our higher courts can effectively accomplish the object sought is yet to be determined.

Our County Court some 7 or 8 years ago subscribed $300,000 to the St. Louis Hannibal and Keokuk R.R. Company,1 and issued bonds to that amount, which have been sold and expended on the grading and ties of the road bed through our County, a distance of some 30 miles, but as yet no iron rails laid on that part, and our road has dragged slowly on.

 


1 See Appendix for 1904 map of Lincoln County showing the St. Louis Hannibal Railroad line.

Diary Page 73

It has however recently been finished and trains now running from Hannibal, the upper terminal down to Bowling Green, a distance 35 miles, and will pretty sure be finished this fall to Prairieville near our County line, and it is hoped and believed through our County next year.

But like many other counties, we too, have refused to pay our bonds, and suit has been commenced, a petition was presented to our County Court the later part of last year, signed by some 2,400 nearly two thirds of the taxpayers of the whole county, praying the court to pay no more principal or interest unless judgment be obtained in the higher courts, which has been finally adopted and suit brought.

It is decidedly my opinion that judgment will be obtained against us by the bondholders, and would be much pleased to see a compromise effected with the bondholder at some 70 cts. on the dollar at 6 percent instead of 10 percent as they are now bearing, and if all parties could be harmoniously consulted in the matter, I believe it could b e effected as a fair compromise, and would about comport to the shrinkage on all other securities and values of lands and other products etc.

August 25th 1877

$42,000 of our bonds were paid before contract was made

Diary Page 74

October the 10th 1878.

Judgment has just been rendered in the United States District Court held at St. Louis against our County on a portion of our Coupons or interest over due on our Lincoln County Rail Road bonds. Other suits are also pending in same Court for interest due other parties who will no doubt obtain judgment in every case. It will probably be taken by appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States where the judgments will no doubt be confirmed against us. Our people by a majority have refused to offer or accept a compromise at 60 cts. on the dollar in renewal bonds bearing 6 per cent in lieu of the old bonds bearing 10 per cent which our bondholders had signified their willingness to accept, and which the County Court was anxious to carryout, it is my opinion that unless some early compromise is made even at a higher rate, that we will have the whole debt and interest to pay, and that we will never be able to make as good a compromise as we have already rejected. Our railroad is now finished to Prairieville on our county line in 12 miles of us at Millwood and will most surely be finished through our County in the next 12 months.

 

Diary Page 75

James Theodore at College

October the 14th 1878.

My son James Theodore1 started this morning to St. Louis to the Christian Brothers College where it is expected he will remain some eight or ten months, with an additional outfit to his clothing etc. of about fifty dollars, and sixty dollars in money, which is presumed will about pay the first quarter at the college.

He has already been two sessions to the high school in Troy, and about eight months to the St. Francis College in Quincy Illinois. And has made very good progress in the different branches of an English education as also the Latin, and music on the piano. He will be twenty years of age the 12th of next December.

Diary Page 76

Published letter on Lincoln County Bonds

April the 8th 1879

As some time has elapsed since I wrote any thing herein, I now paste on the next page with mucilage that has been prepared for gluing or pasting papers together, a printed letter, I wrote for the Troy Herald on our unfortunate Lincoln County bond question. I suppose the mucilage will hold it there, but I am not sure of it. The letter I am pleased to see, meets the views of our most conservative taxpayers. I have also written and had published several other articles on the same subject matter, but not so fully an expression of my opinion and advise to our people as the one I place here. I have received several messages of approval from different quarters both verbal and by letter, one of which from a very respectable gentleman now living in Mexico, Audrain County who formally lived in Troy and still pays taxes on a house and lot there of which I herewith give a copy.

Mexico, Mo
                                                                                                                                March 28th 1879

Judge Henry T. Mudd

Millwood Mo - My dear sir – I have just finished reading your fair, honorable and dignified letter in the Herald of 26th inst. And I cannot refrain from expressing to you my admiration for the manly course you have taken in this whole matter, and for the wisdom of the advise offered your people. I have my little interest in the matter now and my only motive in writing this is to say to you my appreciation of an honest man.

Very Truly Your Friend
J.P. Blanton

 

 


1 James Theodore (Dory Mudd) ABAAA AAE, See pictures in Appendix

 

Diary Page 78

Published Letter on Lincoln County Bonds

LETTER FROM JUDGE MUDD

He Treats at Some Length of the History and

Validity of Our Railroad Bonds.

Editor Herald: It is well known that some twenty-five years ago our state legislature, passed an act granting material state aid in the construction of four great trunk railroads through our state, viz. the Hannibal and St. Joe, passing entirely through the state from east to west, the North Missouri from St. Louis continuing in a Northwestern direction to the southern boundary of the state, both on the northern side of the Missouri river; the Pacific running from St. Louis to the western boundary of the state, and the Iron mountain, running from St. Louis to the southwestern boundary of the state, both on the western side of the Missouri river. It is also well known that these four great trunk roads or thorough fares either passed through or contiguous to the borders of about half the counties of our state, but it was of no material benefit to the other half of our counties, though they had an equal share of the burdens to bear, so far as to the state aid that had been granted in their construction, and our Lincoln County happens to be one of the latter, receiving but very partial benefit from the North Missouri. It is also well known that all these counties, whose misfortune it was to get none, or but little benefit from these trunk roads they had helped to build, were anxiously looking around to see what they could do for themselves. And thus it was that our county, as well as some forty or fifty more of our other counties, in the same condition and under the same circumstances undertook to put forth a gigantic effort to not only get a railroad but to get it through the very

center of the county, where it would do the greatest good to the greatest number of her people, who would have its burdens of payment to bear

, that its statutory limitations It is well known that at the time and under the circumstances that this appropriation was made by our couth court, that a vote of the people was not required by the then existing statutes of the state. Had such vote been required and taken, I am not prepared to say what may have been its results, but of one thing I well know, that many of whom are the loudest, most noisy leaders in its condemnation now, were its best supporters when the stock was taken, and were good fair weather raisers in its behalf long since.

It is also well known that at the time this stock was subscribed by our county court to this road, that the ten years of limitation to its charter had very nearly expired, and unless an organization in conformity with its provision were then effected would have very soon expired, and we could at no subsequent time have effected an organization under its provisions, which fact in part, no doubt, had its influence with our county court of that time to subscribe a large amount of stock to the road as no other opportunity seemed o offer in getting a road in any other way. And this county courts of Lincoln and Ralls counties seem to have taken the initiatory steps of subscription of it stock themselves in the expectation that Pike would follow, and St. Charles would in a measure also come to their rescue. It is also well know that at the time this stock was subscribed, money or greenbacks was plenty, and all kinds of farmer’s products were bringing good prices, and county courts are very much like individuals in the management of their business and finances. They are apt to look and. Act accordingly to the times and surrounding circumstances then existing, and they were not at that time expecting such a reversion in the times and shrinkage in our values that we have since witnessed.

Now it has been said, and perhaps, honestly believed by some of our taxpayers, that the appropriation of the stock and the issue of our bonds were illegal and that a fraud was enacted upon us by the court, and even bribery has been charged, but I must say that I was a pretty careful observer of these transactions during and since their occurrence, and of the honesty and motives of the men who made them; through not approving the subscription when made, and having no part nor agency in it. I utterly fail to see the remotest ground for suspicion of corruption, fraud, or bribery, but as I am not a candidate, and surely never intend to be, my vision may not be correct, or it may not of self-interest to sub serve or to promote a little hackneyed up heaving for themselves, and to be my special interest in self-promotion to see it. But why need we say it, or pretend that we believe it of our county judges any more than the county judges of some forty or more other counties of our state, who about the same time and under the same circumstances done the very same thing, and not only of our state, but of most our Western and Southern states. Many of them may indeed have acted unwisely, and paid too dearly for their whistle, but do their people call it; corruption, fraud, or bribery? I think not. I know they do not, and for what purpose has it been done here in our county. Has it not generally been hatched up by someone, who had a purpose unset the popular prejudices incident to our disappointment, and delay about our road, and what good has all this done? Was there any showing to that effect in the court, or any were then effected, that its statutory imitations attempt to make such showing? As before, said, our county and Rails were the principal stockholders in the company, and at that time I believe there had been on other stock taken, and our stock was subscribe upon the express condition that he whole of it should be expended in our own county, which has been done, and it may well be said that our county was virtually the company itself. And this being the case, did the holders of our bonds when they loaned us their money promise to build, us a road? Or when we borrowed their money or sold them our bonds, was there any agreement of payment only upon

 

Diary Page 78 Continued

condition of our success in getting the road finished at any given time, or at any time? If so, I have always failed to condition, they would have understood it in that light. And I am very much inclined to the opinion that if that had been made a kept their money. Is it right that we should borrow these men’s money, or detain it on our bonds with most solemn promise to pay, and because we have not got, or may never get, our road built, refuse to pay them? And, moreover, this plan will probably very soon be lost, or after all their unfortunate delays and financial difficulties, the present company are making every possible effort in their power to finish the road, and have now got the rolling stock on more than half its distance, and the balance has been near brought to it proper grade and good hopes are now entertained, that it may reach our county seat the present season.

Well now, have we not all occasionally known men who would worry and almost wear themselves out with vexation and cost to get rid of a debt rather than pay it, when they would really have saved time and money and character by its payment, or, for, compromise? And is it not the character and good name and fame of counties and states in a measure the same as that of individuals? Can a man any that he will pay no person of the hard earned money loaned us by these people, and perfectly honorable or honest in his individual affairs? Still we see men acting under that view or theory in this case, that we know to the good and true men so far as their own affairs are concerned; but is it right? If so, I fail to see it. It is very true that if we should have this whole debt to pay it would be a great burden upon us, which, with accumulated interest up the present time, is about $310,000, and is about 8 percent on the assessed value of the whole property of this county. Thus it will be seen by each of our taxpayers what his own share of the debt is when he finds out how.

much his own property is assessed at, by laying 8 percent on it value

But if the compromise proposed by Mr. Cunningham, nearly two years ago, which was acceptable to the county court and Mr. Dunn, but rejected by the committee, had been adopted and our money then on hand been applied to liquidation of $58,000 of our Lincoln county bonds, It would have then brought our debt down to $140,000 at 6 percent; which would have been about 31/2 percent on the assessed value of our property, and the annual interest on the debt only $3,5000, which a ¼ to ½ per cent levy would have paid all the interest, and a small proportion of the principal, annually. Of the forty or fifty counties of our state, which contracted large railroad debts like ourselves, most of them have and are paying them off in full; others have compromised with their bondholders at various amounts but generally governed by their amount of indebtedness and ability of the counties to pay, the bondholders, making liberal discounts, etc. and very few indeed have kept themselves hanging out in the cold like ourselves, but have noted more sensibly and honestly towards their creditors, and have got better, terms than I very much fear we will now be able to obtain.

The old county court was elected without any view to our bond question, with the exception perhaps of judge Trescott. The present court was elected as our safest and best men to represent us, the taxpayers interest on the bond question; and by whom,

 

and for what purpose was Mr. Cunningham employed, and what is the duty of Mr. Josiah Creech in the premises? Then why should we pass resolutions and make buncombe speeches tie them down or ignore them altogether, as though we had no county court or attorney who knew anything at all about the case?

Diary Page 81

It is quite probable that there have been several speeches made on our bond question by persons who imagined that if they had been in Mr. Cunningham’s place in the trial of these I cases in court, they would have knocked the bowels out of the whole fraternity of these dishonest bondholders at the first pop, but like some other big guns or blunderbusses we have heard of before, the greatest danger is behind them, for it is certain they are missing the mark they think they are firing at, and only diverting our people for a proper, sensible and serious consideration of the grave question before us.

We see from Mr. Cunningham’s letter that he thinks the present time not a favorable by the committee, had been adopted and our money then on hand been applied to liquidation of $58,000 of our Lincoln county bonds, It would have then brought our debt down to $140,000 at 6 percent; which would have been about 31/2 percent on the assessed value of our property, and the annual interest on the debt only $3,5000, which a ¼ to ½ per cent levy would have paid all the interest, and a small proportion of the principal, annually. Of the forty or fifty counties of our state, which contracted large railroad debts like ourselves, most of them have and are paying them off in full; others have compromised with their bondholders at various amounts but generally governed by their amount of indebtedness and

 

Diary Page 81 Continued

ability of the counties to pay, the bondholders, making liberal discount, etc., and very few indeed have kept themselves hanging out in the cold like ourselves but have noted more, But have noted more sensibly and honestly towards their creditors, and have got better, terms than I very much fear we will now be able to obtain.

The old county court was elected without any view to our bond question, with the exception perhaps of judge Trescott. The present court was elected as our safest and best men to represent us, the taxpayers interest on the bond question; and by whom, and for what purpose was Mr. Cunningham employed, and what is the duty of Mr. Josiah Creech in the premises? Then why should we pass resolutions and make buncombe speeches tie them down or ignore them altogether, as though we had no county court or attorney who knew anything at all about the case?

It is quite probable that there have been several speeches made on our bond question by persons who imagined that if they had been in Mr. Cunningham’s place in the trial of these I cases in court, they would have knocked the bowels out of the whole fraternity of these dishonest bondholders at the first pop, but like some other big guns or blunderbusses we have heard of before, the greatest danger is behind them, for it is certain they are missing the mark they think they are firing at, and only diverting our people for a proper, sensible and serious consideration of the grave question before us. We see from Mr. Cunningham’s letter that he thinks the present time not a favorable one to propose a compromise to the bondholders, but let us hope by the 15th of April he will have something better to propose, and that such a compromise may yet be had as we shall be able to accede to, and that quiet may once more reign in our county, and that we be spared from years of litigation, turmoil and wrangle; and if we can’t pay all, let us pay what we can. If we can’t pay 8 per cent on what we have, can’t we pay 31/2 or 5 percent on our property? But before we conclude to wipe out this debt by repudiation, after being declared valid and not a fraud by the courts, let us inquire if we have not many

taxpayers in our county who are the descendants of, and have the blood coursing through their veins of the honored names of such as Jas. Finley, Jas. Reid, David Stewart, Dan’l Kimler, Rob’t B. Allen, Meacon A Shelton, Francis Parker, Charles Wheeler, Henry Martin, Littleton Dryden, and many others of our honored dead, who have gone before us, who, if they could speak from the silent tombs in which their bodies have been laid, would admonish us to beware how we take the labor and sweat of others, though it may be in an unutilized road bed that we have promised to pay for, without just compensation or agreement and compromise of rights. I am not unmindful that the statements of facts and views here given may not, or will not suit the present temper and opinions of a good many of our people, for some people either cannot, or will not, see the side of a thing, when it takes dollars and cents out of their pockets to see it; in fact, it comes so natural to some people that they cannot help closing their eves against it. It is an involuntary act on their part that can’t be helped. But while I think it vastly better to offer our bondholders a fair compromise in payment of our bonds, I am not willing to pay them in full; nor do I believe justice demands it of us. The original holders of these bonds paid, I think, about an average of 87 ½ cents on the dollar for them, and the money they paid for them was worth at the time about 85 cents on the dollar. They can, and will make very material reduction the mark they think we be spared from years of litigation, turmoil and wrangle; and if we can’t pay all, let us pay what we can. If we can’t pay 8 per cent on what we they are firing at, and only diverting our people for a proper, sensible and serious consideration of the grave question before us. in both principal and interest on them. And when the fair thing is offered them and they refuse to take it, it is then time enough for us to buckle on our armor for the combat, and then I am with you, but not until then. The compromise proposed by Mr. Cunningham to be settled in renewal bonds at 65 cents on the dollar, bearing 6 per cent,

to run ten years, counting the discount of principal 35 cents on the dollar, and ½ per cent, less on interest, would have been a little less than half at the end of ten years. And it was the intention of the court at that time not to have levied more than ½ of 1 percent, on the people to have met the interest and a small portion of the principal annually, until a more suitable time, and in the hope that before much of the principal was paid, that the road would be finished and giving us important aid in its payment.

Some have charged me with being ungentlemanly and unmanly enough to be a bondholder myself, but for my good name for honesty and fair dealing, and long residence here, I don’t think it right to class me with a set of men of such doubtful morality or honesty, especially as at that time I had not a dollar to lose or invest: but I must acknowledge, with a considerable degree of compunction and shame, that my little share of stock in the bank at Troy makes me virtually the part owner of one $500 bond, whilst it will be seen from the tas-book that my individual share of the debt, if the whole should, ever, be paid (not counting my married son and son-in-law, who are average taxpayers), is about $1,000; and counting my children with me, I am to say the least of it, three to one on the side of the taxpayers, whose interest have at all times had my most sincere sympathy and best efforts to serve.

Henry T. Mudd

Since writing the above, I see that both branches of our legislature have passed an act that awaits the signature of the Governor that seems to smack right smart of what I have been talking about. I mean repudiation. At least an effort seems to be made in that direction to so hamper and shackle the process of collection, as may perhaps, virtually obstruct it altogether; but if that be the effect of it, as their backs are much broader than ours, it will be some consolation for us to know that we are saved the humiliation, in the meantime it will perhaps give us the better chance to compromise, as it is well known it does not pay the debt of remove the obligation

H.T.M.

 

 

 

Diary Page 83

Communications from Surety bond payers

August 26th 1879.

Having written nothing herein for some time back, I think it may not be uninteresting hereafter to my children to read the three following communications written and published by me over the signature of Aunty Bonpayer, and three were published in both our county papers, the Herald and Free Press1.

They were written and published as will appear with the same object and motives in view as my preceding letter on our bond matters, and has been read, I think, with more pleasure and amusement by our people than anything that has appeared in either of our County papers, especially by those of whom I so freely speak. And although speaking and dealing with the matter ironically, I think it perhaps has done more good in bringing about a conservative state of feely and action by the people of our County than anything else. And at our last meeting held in Troy it was voted by a very large majority to pay 65 cents (without the two years interest) on the dollar, in compromise on the bonds, a vote that never was, or could have been had before, which was a good move in the right direction but not far enough.

The offer however has been flatly refused at a conference held by our County Court and attorneys

Diary Page 84

now more fully understand what we have lost by an obstinate refused sustain and acquires in the views of the County Court two years ago, when a good compromise could have been had before judgments were obtained against us.

There is only about $45,000 of our bonds held by the citizens of our County, and perhaps as much more by Senator Henderson of St. Louis.

The holders of these bonds of whom I so freely speak are my most particular friends, and constitute the most respectable and intelligent element of our County, and Judge Kreble and Senator Henderson have both been most intimate friends of mine. Since they commenced the practice of law near by forty years ago. Kreble is now one of the judges of the United Sates District Court.

His quartering of troops or soldiers on my brother Alexander (now member of the legislature from this county) and myself as stated is true, but his action and conduct whilst at my house with forty soldiers and as many horse all and night was that of a friend and gentleman.

It was my intention to have continued a further series of these communications over the same signature, but their authorship was found out or suspected by a good many persons, and made it a matter of less interest. Hence their discontinuance at least for the present.

 

Diary Page 91

FROM JUDGE MUDD

Editors Free Press: My article published in the Herald, 20th March, in which I took somewhat in general review of the whole matter of our county bonded indebtness has brought a number of letters of approval, as well also as verbal; and indeed, I may say I have met with no one that disputes its correctness. And among which will be found the two, following letters, form two of our most respected former fellow citizens of this county, and as they are both gentlemen whose opinions I would prize very highly, and not here now mixing up in our present troubles. I will take the privilege to publish them. The first is from Mr. J.P. Blanton, of Mexico, Mo., late Professor and teacher to the high school at Troy. And the other from Doctor N.G.Leake, who practiced his profession at, and near Millwood for many years, as well as being a farmer and stock raiser to a considerable extent, and owning some 150 acres of farming land on the West Prairie, but went back to Kentucky some years ago, and, is now engaged in Merchandising and farming, both, as also the practice of his profession, of which he is considered far in advance of mediocrity, as well as a gentleman of the fine sense, purity of character, and doubtless has many old friends here in this part of our county that will be pleased to hear from him as one of their old and much esteemed friends

HENRY T. MUDD

Mexico Mo. March 28th, 1879

Judge H.T. Mudd, Millwood Mo.,

My dear sir. – I have just finished reading your fair, honorable and dignified letter in the Herald of 26th inst. And cannot refrain from expressing to you my admiration for the manly course you have taken in this whole matter, and for the wisdom of the advice you offer the people. I have very little interest in the matter now, and my only motive in writing this is to convey to you my appreciation of an honest man.

Very truly your friend.

J.P. BLANTON

 

New Haven Nelson Co. KY.

April 15th, 1879

Judge H.T. MUDD. My Dear Sir:

Your favor of the 22nd inst., in which found your published article in regard to your railroad troubles, arrived yesterday. I have been intending to write to your for some time in answer to a letter I received from you sometime since, but owing to multiplicity of business duties was unable to do so.

In regard to your position on your bonded railroad debt, I think you are exactly right, and indeed I cannot see how a conscientious man can take other ground. Certainly we have no more right to rob a bondholder than we have to rob any one else. Nor is the bondholder to blame for buying bonds for less than their value. Suppose you sell a horse for half its value, is there any one who would claim that it was not a legal sale? Surely the holders of Lincoln county bonds did not obtain them without the consent of the county. If so the county had better have trustees appointed to take care of it. It is reasonable, to suppose that the county entered in to a contract with the bondholders, sold them her bonds, obligated herself to pay them with stipulated interest by a certain time, and that the county fixed the prices on these bonds, and if she sold them for less than they were worth, she alone is to blame, and not the bondholder. But you say money was worthless when the bonds were sold than it is now (right here, most say that this is the only point upon which I differ with you) admitted but is this any reason that the obligation in letter and spirit should not be discharged?

Suppose money was worth less now than when the bonds were sold, is there a man in Lincoln county who would, be willing to reverse that theory. I am on of those who believe that states, counties and corporations should have no more privileges than individuals when it comes to repudiating solemn obligations. I am very sorry the people of Lincoln, my ever to be remembered

old home, has taken upon themselves such heavy borders, but in as much as they have done so I sincerely hope, for the credit of the county, they will have spirit and manhood enough to discharge their obligations. Our spring has been quite backward, but little corn planted yet. I am doing some farming myself but the necessary attention required to farm, store and to keep up my practice is no easy job, as you know.

I took a trip to Missouri in March, arrived in St. Louis the 25th and in Hannibal the 26th and spent five or six days in Hannibal, and Monroe and Ralls counties. I found times out there exceedingly dull. It would have given me great pleasure to have visited Lincoln county, especially as my daughter Georgia was with me and desired much to see her, native home, but it was impossible for me to spare the time. The Free Press with which I am well pleased, comes tolerably regular now but it was several weeks before, I received the first number after subscribing for it.

My family all join in sending their best regards to yourself, Mrs. Mudd and family

Hoping to hear from you soon and often I remain very truly your friend.

N.G. LEAKE

 

Diary Page 95

October the 4th 1879.

Mary, Dory and myself have just returned from a very pleasant trip to Louisiana by way of Prairieville, and return by Bowling Green etc. We met quite a number of old friends, and made some new acquaintances in Louisiana. Went to the theater the night we stayed there, and had very pleasant time out at the agricultural and stock fair, where we also met many friends. Whilst in Louisiana, Mary purchased a new carpet and sofa for our parlor, which we brought home with us in spring wagon.

Oct 8th 1879.

We finished sowing on the 30th Sept. 83 acres in wheat, which is unusually large crop for me. We commenced sowing on Monday the 15th Sept. In our first sowing the Hessian fly is already making its appearance by its deposit of eggs, whilst my brother, Alexander represents a 40 acre field of his to be probably ruined by the fly, the deposit eggs being in almost every stalk. His was sown a little earlier than mine. Much apprehension is now felt for our unusually large crop of wheat just sown especially our earliest sowing. It is now reported that may of our earliest sown fields are already most seriously damaged, if not destroyed. It is believed a hard frost would materially check or destroy the fly, which we are anxiously hoping for soon.

 

 

Diary Page 99

February the 5th 1880

The account posted on this page of the burning of my son James Edwin Mudd’s house, I wrote and had published in the Troy Herald and as it contains substantial and correct account of the burning, his loss etc. I need not say more of it – unless I may now say that his loss is even greater than I estimated when I wrote the article.

A very destructive fire resulting in the loss of Mr. James Edwin Mudd’s dwelling house, together with his kitchen, meat house, hen house and buggy house, occurred on Tuesday last destroying every house on his place except his stable, which fortunately was a little too far away for the flame to reach.

The cause from which the fire originated cannot be fully determined. A fire had been kept in the lower fire place of one of the chimneys during the day and as the fire was first discovered between the ceiling of one of the upper rooms and the top of the roof it is supposed that from burning soot some fire or sparks passed through some defect or opening in the chimney and ignited to some light fragments of wood near by.

Mr. Edwin was at Millwood attending a sale when it occurred, and no persons at home but his wife in bed with a young baby 8 days old and Miss Annie Chandler, a young woman living with them, and when the fire was first discovered by them and seeing no means at hand to extinguish it, Mrs. Mudd sent Annie to Mr. Wm. Riley’s, their nearest neighbor to give the alarm, in the meantime putting her baby in a safe place and almost forgetting her delicate situation, went systematically to work with all her strength to save all such things as lay in her power. Annie being the first to return almost breathless to her relief put in her best efforts also.

Mr. Riley being also from home, Mrs. Riley sent her daughter to Mr. Hickerson’s, a mile or more away, where she knew there were a lot of hands collected, her husband among them at a log rolling; she making her best speed to Mr. Cons. Mudd’s. Cons being at his school and his brother Albert at Hickerson’s. Mrs. Riley, Mrs. C. Mudd and Miss Shelbie Moore ran with all possible haste to the burning building, rendering most valuable service in saving every thing in

their power. But the large new piano in their parlor with many other valuable things with all the efforts of these heroic ladies were considered doomed to the fiery elements. But lo and behold! Hickerson and his stalwart men are seen in the distance; they and Miss Riley had lost no time in covering space; axes are had and the door facings cut away leading to the hall, as also the outer door and a part of the staircase, and the piano as well as some other things are still saved. A few moments more and the dwelling and all its little surrounding buildings with a considerable of the paling and plank fence lie a burning mass on the ground. Edwin not hearing of his misfortune in time to reach home until it was too late to render any assistance Accidents like this are certainly to be dreaded. Indeed are more or less appalling to behold, but when it is considered that so much was saved and the young wife in so delicate a situation passed through such an ordeal for near half an hour alone in rescuing those things always dear to a good wife, in safety, it is still pleasant to know the misfortunes were not still greater.

Although many things of value were saved, the loss is a heavy one; they lost all their meat and other provisions on hand, one bed and bedding and other things upstairs that could not be reached, cook stove, side saddle, fine shot gun, valuable tools, two bureaus, many articles of clothing and other things which together with the buildings would make total loss upwards of a thousand dollars. Edwin and his good wife have the sympathy of many friends who are glad to learn that he is already taking active steps to rebuild.

MILLWOOD, Mo., Jan 30, 1880

 

Diary Page 100

At our special request, President Perkins permits us to publish the following letter from Judge Mudd:

.

MILLWOOD MO. FEB. 20th 1880

Mr. H.W. PERKINS: I have not been able to attend the late meetings or take any active part in the matter, but am pleased to see the prospects of the Lincoln County Agricultural and Mechanical Fair a little "sorter" booming at last; and am for a fact expecting to be on hand next fall with my whole family.

And, although I have partly forgotten some of their names, I am in hopes to meet the same old committee we had in the tent at our stock sales last fall, and in fact I could name a good many other old fellows as well as the ex and present county judges I met there before and would like to meet again.

And finally I would like to meet the bone and sinew of the county with sons and daughters there; and, with this hope and expectation in view, you will please add my name to the list for four shares of stock.

Yours Respy.

HENRY T. MUDD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Page                                                                                                                                                 Next Page


File contributed for use on USGenWeb/MOGenWeb Lincoln County Heritage Page by Thomas J. Mudd, 10 March 2002.  Link change or update: 16 Mar 2002

USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free genealogical information on the Internet, data may be freely used for personal research and by non-commercial entities, as long as this message remains on all copied material. These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or presentation by other organization or persons. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material for profit or any form of presentation, must obtain the written consent of the file submitter, or their legal representative, and contact the listed USGenWeb archivist with proof of this consent.